In a collector’s edition embossed full metal jacket…

As physicists, we often think about information in terms of entropy, computation, or fundamental limits. But what about the sheer data volume contained within a biological system as complex as Homo sapiens? After some thought, we explored the storage requirements if we were to digitise two key components of human biological information: the genomic sequence and a high-resolution neuro-connectome derived from advanced imaging modalities.

Let’s break down the numbers.

The Genomic Data Footprint.

The human genome comprises approximately 3.1×109 base pairs. Given that each base pair (considering the canonical Watson-Crick pairing rules reduce the degrees of freedom per pair compared to independent bases) can effectively be encoded using 2 bits (e.g., A-T as 00, T-A as 11, C-G as 01, G-C as 10), the total information content of the haploid human genome sequence is roughly:

3.1×109 base pairs×2 bits/base pair=6.2×109 bits.

Converting this to more familiar storage units (using the standard 1 byte=8 bits and 1 MB=10242 bytes):

6.2×109 bits/8 bits/byte=7.75×108 bytes.

7.75×108 bytes/(1024 bytes/KB×1024 KB/MB)≈739.1 MB.

So, the fundamental sequence information of one copy of the human genome is surprisingly compact, roughly equivalent to the data on a standard CD-ROM.

Incorporating the Neuro-Connectome

Beyond the static genetic code, the dynamic and structural connectivity of the brain represents a vastly larger information space. Capturing a detailed human neuro-connectome using modalities like fMRI (functional connectivity, temporal dynamics) and PET (metabolic activity, receptor distribution) generates significant data volumes. The exact size is highly variable depending on spatial and temporal resolution, scan duration, and the complexity of the derived connectomic models (e.g., adjacency matrices, graph representations).

Referencing data from large-scale projects like the Human Connectome Project, raw and minimally pre-processed fMRI data for a single subject can range from tens to potentially hundreds of gigabytes. A comprehensive, processed connectome dataset integrating multiple modalities would likely fall into the gigabyte range per individual. For our calculation, let’s use a representative figure of 30 GB for a processed fMRI/PET neuro-connectome dataset, acknowledging this is a simplified estimate.

Converting the neuro-connectome data to megabytes:

30 GB×1024 MB/GB=30,720 MB

The total estimated data size for the human blueprint (DNA) plus the neuro-connectome is:

739.1 MB (DNA)+30,720 MB (Neuro-connectome)=31,459.1 MB

This combined dataset is approximately 31.5 GB.

Storage Media Requirements:

Now, let’s consider how this combined data volume maps onto common optical storage media:

• CD-R (700 MB capacity):31,459.1 MB/700 MB/CD-R≈44.94Requires 45 CD-Rs.
• DVD-R (4.7 GB ≈ 4812.8 MB capacity):31,459.1 MB/4812.8 MB/DVD-R≈6.54Requires 7 DVD-Rs.
• BD-ROM (Single-layer, 25 GB ≈ 25600 MB capacity):31,459.1 MB/25600 MB/BD-ROM≈1.23Requires 2 single-layer BD-ROMs.
• BD-ROM (Dual-layer, 50 GB ≈ 51200 MB capacity):31,459.1 MB/51200 MB/BD-ROM≈0.61Requires 1 dual-layer BD-ROM.
• 
• 

In conclusion, while the fundamental genetic sequence is relatively compact in terms of digital storage, the complexity captured by advanced neuroimaging modalities significantly increases the data footprint. Storing a combined dataset of one individual’s genome and a representative neuro-connectome moves from requiring multiple DVDs to fitting comfortably on a single dual-layer Blu-ray disc. This highlights the scale difference between the relatively static genetic blueprint and the highly complex, spatially and temporally resolved data representing brain connectivity.

Another fine (satirical web-app) innovation from Cydonis Heavy Industries! 😉😜💸🍃

Energy Transfer LP is a name you might recognise, often associated with the vast network of pipelines criss-crossing the United States, moving oil, natural gas, and other hydrocarbons. They are a giant in the midstream energy sector, playing a critical role in getting fossil fuels from where they’re extracted to where they’re processed and consumed. On the surface, their work is presented as essential to modern life – fuelling our cars, heating our homes, and powering our industries.

However, a closer look at Energy Transfer’s operations and history reveals a pattern of controversy and significant ethical concerns that challenge the narrative of essential service. Their core business model, while legal and profitable, often comes at a steep cost to the environment, Indigenous communities, and private landowners.

The most prominent example, and perhaps the most ethically fraught, is the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). The construction of this pipeline sparked massive protests, primarily led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and their allies. The concerns were manifold: the pipeline’s route threatened sacred burial grounds and cultural sites, and its crossing beneath the Missouri River raised serious fears of potential oil spills that could contaminate the tribe’s primary water source. The forceful response to these peaceful protests, involving law enforcement and private security, drew international condemnation and highlighted the stark power imbalance between a large corporation and Indigenous peoples asserting their rights and sovereignty.

Beyond DAPL, Energy Transfer has faced numerous accusations of environmental damage. Incidents involving pipeline leaks and spills are not uncommon in the industry, but Energy Transfer’s record includes significant events that have polluted water sources and damaged ecosystems. Critics argue that the company’s pursuit of profit has, at times, overridden adequate environmental safeguards and responsible construction practices. The long-term consequences of these incidents on local environments and the health of nearby communities are a major ethical consideration.

———————————————————————–

“The unnatural tendency & anthropogenic bias, leading us all towards catastrophic outcomes… Terminal greed at terminal velocity…”

Furthermore, the process of acquiring land for pipeline routes often involves the use of eminent domain, a legal tool that allows the government (or, in this case, a private company acting with government approval) to take private property for public use, even if the owner doesn’t want to sell. While legally sanctioned, the application of eminent domain for private gain, particularly when it disrupts farms, homes, or environmentally sensitive areas, raises profound questions about property rights, corporate power, and the public good. Landowners have reported feeling bullied or unfairly compensated, adding another layer to the ethical debate surrounding the company’s expansion.

The very nature of Energy Transfer’s business – facilitating the transportation of fossil fuels – places it at the centre of the climate crisis debate. While demand for these fuels exists, the ethical responsibility of companies involved in their infrastructure is increasingly being questioned. By building and expanding pipeline networks, companies like Energy Transfer are enabling the continued reliance on energy sources that contribute to global warming, potentially undermining efforts to transition to renewable energy and mitigate climate impacts.

A mesmerising, photorealistic swinging pendulum from a vintage grandfather clock occupies the foreground. The pendulum—elegant in its design—is caught mid-swing, its motion subtly blurred to evoke dynamic energy. Etched along its sleek surface is the delicate, symbolic outline of a human skull, its contours both haunting and artistic, symbolising the chiral nature of the complex and dynamic Earth-Sun-Moon system & all organic molecules.

In conclusion, while Energy Transfer plays a significant role in the current energy landscape, its operations are shadowed by serious ethical concerns. From clashes with Indigenous communities and environmental controversies to questions surrounding land acquisition and its role in the fossil fuel economy, the company’s pursuit of its business goals has frequently come at the expense of other critical values. Understanding Energy Transfer requires looking beyond the infrastructure they build and considering the human and environmental costs associated with their core business model.

1. Why did the fossil fuel executive get kicked out of the empathy convention? He kept asking for carbon offsets for his tears.
2. My therapist told me to connect with my feelings. As a fossil fuel executive, I told him I outsourced that department years ago.
3. Heard they’re teaching compassion in business schools now. Fossil fuel executives are demanding a refund on their degrees.
4. What’s the difference between a fossil fuel executive and a robot? The robot might actually be programmed to care.
5. How many fossil fuel executives does it take to screw in a light bulb? None, they prefer to keep everyone in the dark about the rising temperatures.
6. If a tree falls in the forest and a fossil fuel executive is there, does he hear it? Only if it lowers the value of the timber rights he owns.
7. Scientists say the Earth is getting warmer. Fossil fuel executives say their holiday bonuses are too.
8. I tried to explain the concept of a sustainable future to a fossil fuel executive. He just asked if it was a new market for drilling.
9. What do you call a fossil fuel executive with a conscience? A renewable resource… because he’s so rare.
10. A fossil fuel executive walks into a doctor’s office. The doctor says, “I’ve got bad news, you appear to have a calcified heart.” The executive replies, “Great! Is that a taxable asset?”

“Project Ratatosk…”

Spaceports usually conjure images of sun-drenched coastlines, vast, empty plains, or remote islands – places chosen for their unobstructed views of the sky and minimal population below. After all, sending rockets into orbit involves powerful forces and the need for safe areas for launch trajectories and potential falling debris.

When the idea of a spaceport in Wakefield came up, the initial thought was, understandably, how the practical requirements stack up against the reality of an inland city in West Yorkshire. Traditional spaceports need clear paths over unpopulated areas or water, ideally benefiting from the Earth’s spin near the equator. Wakefield, while a fantastic place, doesn’t quite fit that mould. Its location and population density pose significant challenges for conventional rocket launches.

But then, the conversation took a fascinating turn! What if this wasn’t about traditional rockets and chemical propulsion? What if we were talking about something far more advanced – a safely contained wormhole?

This changes everything! With a contained wormhole, the need for vast downrange safety zones for falling rocket stages disappears. The focus shifts dramatically from trajectory mechanics to the requirements of the wormhole technology itself.

In this hypothetical Wakefield, a wormhole spaceport would need:

• A large physical footprint: Wormhole generators, containment fields, power sources, and areas for loading and unloading spacecraft or cargo would demand a considerable amount of land.
• High Security and Containment: Even “safely contained” technology of this magnitude would require stringent security measures and potentially a buffer zone, not for falling debris, but for the facility itself.
• Robust Infrastructure: Good road or rail links would be essential for transporting materials, personnel, and anything destined for transit through the wormhole.
• Immense Power: Generating and stabilising a wormhole would likely require an astronomical amount of energy, necessitating a very powerful and reliable energy supply.

So, if we were forced by absolute necessity to find a spot in Wakefield for this sci-fi facility, where might we look? We’d have to seek out the areas that offer the largest contiguous plots of land with the lowest relative population density within the district. This could potentially point towards:

• Large industrial estates or former industrial sites: Areas already zoned for large-scale operations, like the Wakefield Hub or extensive decommissioned industrial land, might offer the required space and some existing infrastructure.
• Expansive, less developed areas on the district’s fringes: Looking towards the more rural borders could provide larger open areas, though acquiring and developing such land would still be a massive undertaking and impact existing landscapes and scattered communities.

Even with the wormhole concept, placing such a colossal and potentially disruptive facility within a place like Wakefield remains a highly complex challenge. Finding a site large enough, ensuring absolute safety and security, and managing the impact on surrounding communities would be monumental tasks.

Ultimately, while the idea of a spaceport in Wakefield is highly ‘improbable’ under current [hah! They know nothing…] technology, the thought experiment of a wormhole facility allows us to imagine a different kind of gateway to the stars, one where the constraints are less about gravity and trajectories and more about energy, containment, and finding enough elbow room [or stiff upper lip…] in West Yorkshire!

Some thoughts…

Imagine life not just as biological cells, but as information. Complex, self-replicating information encoded in DNA. Now, imagine this information travelling across the vastness of space, seeding new worlds. This is the core idea behind panspermia. But what if the “seed” isn’t a hardy microbe, but the very blueprint for life, measured by its inherent complexity? This is where the concept of Kolmogorov complexity meets the cosmic hypothesis of information panspermia.

What is Kolmogorov Complexity?

At its heart, Kolmogorov complexity is a measure of the computational resources needed to describe an object. More formally, it’s the length of the shortest possible computer program that can generate that object.

Think of it like this:

• The sequence “0101010101010101” is simple. A short program could generate it: “print ’01’ eight times”. Its Kolmogorov complexity is low.
• A truly random sequence like “3.1415926535…” (the digits of Pi) or a complex image would require a much longer program to generate precisely. You’d essentially need to store the sequence itself or a very detailed algorithm. Their Kolmogorov complexity is high.

In essence, Kolmogorov complexity quantifies the irreducible information content of something. It’s not about how complicated something looks, but how complicated it is to describe or generate from scratch.

Information Panspermia: Life as a Cosmic Data Packet

Panspermia is the hypothesis that life exists throughout the universe and is distributed by space dust, meteoroids, asteroids, comets, and planetoids. Information panspermia takes this a step further. It suggests that what travels across space isn’t necessarily a living organism itself, but the information required to create life. This information could be encoded in various ways – perhaps in the molecular structure of complex organic molecules, or even in hypothetical non-biological forms.

The idea is that if the necessary information arrives on a suitable planet, it could kickstart the process of abiogenesis (the origin of life from non-living matter) or guide the evolution of simpler life forms towards greater complexity.

The Connection: Measuring the Seed’s Potential

How do Kolmogorov complexity and information panspermia relate?

1. Complexity of the Seed: If life is fundamentally information, then the “seed” of information panspermia must possess a certain level of complexity to encode the necessary instructions for life. Kolmogorov complexity provides a theoretical way to measure this intrinsic complexity. A simple, low-complexity information packet wouldn’t be sufficient to encode the intricate machinery of even the simplest cell.
2. Survivability and Propagation: Highly complex information is often more fragile. A simple sequence is easy to transmit and replicate accurately. A highly complex sequence is more susceptible to errors during transmission or replication. This raises questions: How could complex biological information survive the harsh conditions of space and accurately replicate upon arrival? Perhaps the “seed” is not the full blueprint, but a highly compressed, information-rich starting point – something with high Kolmogorov complexity relative to its physical size.
3. Detecting Cosmic Information: If information panspermia is a real phenomenon, could we detect these cosmic information packets? Would they have unique characteristics related to their Kolmogorov complexity that distinguish them from random noise or simpler natural processes? This is highly speculative, but it’s a fascinating thought experiment.

Beyond Biology: The Information Universe?

Considering life through the lens of information and complexity opens up intriguing possibilities. Could the universe itself be fundamentally computational? Could information be a more fundamental building block than matter or energy? While these are deep philosophical questions, the concepts of Kolmogorov complexity and information panspermia provide a framework for thinking about the origins and spread of life in a universe governed by the laws of physics and information theory.

Whether or not information panspermia is happening, exploring these ideas helps us appreciate the incredible complexity encoded within life and the profound mysteries of our cosmic origins. It encourages us to look beyond the familiar biological forms and consider the possibility that the universe might be teeming with information, waiting for the right conditions to blossom into complexity.

What are your thoughts on this fascinating intersection of information theory and astrobiology? Let me know in the comments below!